Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 105(4): 631-638, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092231

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of combination therapy (hydrodilatation and subdeltoid bursa injection with corticosteroid, mobilization, and physical therapy [PT]) with that of PT alone for treating frozen shoulder. DESIGN: A prospective, 2-arm parallel, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation clinic of a private academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=70) with frozen shoulder (freezing stage). INTERVENTIONS: Participants (n=35) in the combination group underwent hydrodilatation and subdeltoid bursa injection with corticosteroid twice, mobilization, and usual-care PT for 8 weeks; participants (n=35) in the PT group received only the usual-care PT for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures were pain scores on a visual analog scale, range of motion (ROM), the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), quality of life (evaluated using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]), and self-assessment of the treatment effect. RESULTS: Compared with the PT group, the combination group had significantly better pain (during activity), SPADI, SDQ, active and passive ROM, and self-assessment scores (all P<.001) as well as scores on some parts of the SF-36 (physical function and bodily pain, P<.05). Between-group differences were significant at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of hydrodilatation (with corticosteroid), bursal corticosteroid injection, and joint mobilization with PT was superior to PT alone for treating frozen shoulder, and the effects persisted for at least 6 months.


Assuntos
Bursite , Articulação do Ombro , Humanos , Ombro , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Qualidade de Vida , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Bursite/tratamento farmacológico , Dor de Ombro , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Clin Rehabil ; 37(9): 1189-1200, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37021475

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether combination of corticosteroid subdeltoid injections and physiotherapy was more effective than either treatment alone in chronic subacromial bursitis. DESIGN: Prospective, three-arm randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic subacromial bursitis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into corticosteroid injection (N = 36), physiotherapy (N = 40) and combined (N = 35) groups. Two corticosteroid subdeltoid injections in corticosteroid group, 8-week physical therapy emphasising on therapeutic exercise in physiotherapy group, and combined both treatments in combined group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were pain visual analogue scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 8 weeks after finishing treatment. The secondary outcome measures were active range of motion, Shoulder Disability Questionnaire, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, patient's evaluation of treatment effect, and symptom recurrence. RESULTS: Group comparison showed significant statistical difference in shoulder flexion (P < 0.003) and patient's evaluation of treatment effect (P < 0.001). The time and group interactions comparison revealed significant statistical differences in pain score (P < 0.024), external rotation (P < 0.044) and patient's evaluation of treatment effect (P < 0.001). The above statistics were in favour of the corticosteroid and combined groups rather than physiotherapy group. The percentage of recurrence was 36.1, 7.5 and 17.1 in the corticosteroid, physiotherapy and combined groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid subdeltoid injection, or combined with physiotherapy, was superior to physiotherapy alone, but the recurrence rate was least in the physiotherapy group.


Assuntos
Bursite , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Doença Crônica , Bursite/diagnóstico , Bursite/terapia , Dor , Resultado do Tratamento , Dor de Ombro/diagnóstico , Dor de Ombro/tratamento farmacológico , Dor de Ombro/etiologia , Síndrome de Colisão do Ombro/terapia
10.
Clin Rehabil ; 36(2): 230-239, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34791911

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To study the addition of feedback-guided neck strength home exercise to physical therapy as an enhanced rehabilitation programme in the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain. DESIGN: A prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation department of an academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic neck pain. INTERVENTIONS: The patients in both groups received supervised physical therapy sessions 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Patients in Group A (N = 38) used the neck strengthening exerciser device for 20 min daily at home for 6 weeks and patients in Group B (N = 20) performed 20 min of daily regular neck exercise at home for 6 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Neck disability index, pain visual analogue scale, active range of motion of the neck, Patient Global Assessment and patient evaluation of treatment effect. All subjects were assessed at baseline as well as at 6- and 12-week follow-ups. RESULTS: At the 6-week follow-up, Group A exhibited significantly greater improvements (P < 0.05) in pain Visual Analogue Scale (Group A: 2.97 ± 1.57; Group B: 4.20 ± 1.82), neck disability index (Group A: 13.95 ± 8.07; Group B: 20.07 ± 9.14) and active cervical extension (Group A: 65.26 ± 12.76; Group B: 51.45 ± 11.78). At 12-week follow-up, Group A also exhibited significantly greater active cervical extension (Group A: 67.74 ± 11.94; Group B: 53.85 ± 14.09; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding neck strengthening exerciser home training to physical therapy was demonstrated to be more effective than physical therapy alone for patients with chronic neck pain.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Cervicalgia , Dor Crônica/terapia , Terapia por Exercício , Retroalimentação , Humanos , Cervicalgia/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 86: 84-90, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33894560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Microscopic colitis is a form of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by profuse non-bloody watery diarrhea. Macroscopic abnormality is not present on colonoscopy, and it requires biopsy for diagnosis. Few cases have been attributed to levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor therapy. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of 21 patients on levodopa/benserazide and one patient on levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel with clinically suspected or biopsy proven microscopic colitis. RESULTS: All 21 patients on oral levodopa/benserazide had resolution of diarrhea with cessation of the medication. Four patients discontinued levodopa permanently. Two were rechallenged with levodopa/benserazide without symptom recurrence. One patient on oral levodopa/carbidopa developed diarrhea only with intermittent dispersible levodopa/benserazide. 14 were switched to levodopa/carbidopa with resolution of diarrhea in 9 but symptom recurrence in 5. One patient on oral levodopa/benserazide developed profuse diarrhea when switched to levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel. Of 7/22 patients who had colonoscopy and biopsy, 5 had histopathological proven microscopic colitis. CONCLUSION: levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor induced microscopic colitis may be more common than previously suspected, with the potential to affect treatment compliance and therapeutic options.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Benserazida/efeitos adversos , Colite Microscópica/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carbidopa , Estudos de Coortes , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Neurol India ; 67(6): 1532-1535, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857554

RESUMO

Distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy (DADS) is a variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) characterized by symmetrical, distal, sensory or sensorimotor involvement. DADS with M-protein (DADS-M) is less responsive to immunotherapy compared to those without M-protein (DADS-I). We report a case of DADS-I with severe clinical presentation viz. early hand involvement with marked wasting, inexcitable peripheral nerves on neurophysiology and poor response to immunotherapy. Despite the unusual presentation, ancillary tests including cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve biopsy and nerve ultrasound were supportive of an inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. This case demonstrated the heterogeneity of the disorder and expands the clinical spectrum of DADS neuropathy.


Assuntos
Imunoglobulina M , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/diagnóstico , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Eletrodiagnóstico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/imunologia , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/fisiopatologia , Prednisolona/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...